Search for: "Fields v. Sanders et al" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm by Prof. Rick Sander, guest-blogging
Using data gathered by the university, Arcidiacono et al found that this narrowing was illusory. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm by Mark Zamora
case=14595711359472781380&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr  SALLIE MANESS, Plaintiff,v.BOSTON SCIENTIFIC, et al., Defendants. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
” •    Although studies have shown modest reductions in some vitamins and other nutrients after pasteurization of milk, these changes are insignificant according to a review by Potter et al (1984), human nutrition studies have shown no advantage of raw over pasteurized milk. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
The phosphodiesterases 5 inhibitor medications (PDE5i) seem to arouse the litigation propensities of the lawsuit industry. [read post]